Немного международные страсти улеглись и я написал про Иран
с точки зрения реализма (или отсутствия такового) в американской внешней
политике:
…In these
situations the United States either unnecessarily pokes a regime whose
cooperation is essential to American foreign policy goals, or else it indulges
in harmful, empty, bellicose rhetoric. In the latter case, the damage to public
opinion is obvious, portraying Washington as either powerless or hypocritical.
Iran policy therefore exemplifies a bigger problem for American diplomacy: how
to balance narrow foreign policy goals with the idealistic rhetoric on which
this policy is based? One can look at either Obama’s 2010 State of the Union
address or the National Security Strategy of 2015 to be certain that under his
administration the United States still sees itself as the chief power to
“insist that governments uphold their human rights obligations, to speak out
against repression wherever it occurs, and to work to prevent, and, if
necessary, to respond to mass atrocities.” But policies based on this view are
implemented not in a vacuum but within the whole framework of international
relations, which are becoming more complicated with every year…
No comments:
Post a Comment